I like the dynapack dyno because it does give you realistic and repetative numbers because it removes some variables (tires and their pressure wheel weight). I like the dynojet on the other hand because you get to the wheel numbers and that is what i need since im not racing my car on the hub, but at the track.I have to agree its by user preference, but i like both dynos.
- Dynapack Viewer Software App
- Dynapack Viewer Software Download
- Dynapack Viewer Software Free
- Dynapack Viewer Software Developer
Quickly open the application of your choice. Here you will find a range of Dynapac branded items that are designed to communicate the Dynapac brand. Included in the package was Paving Manager Pro, advanced Dynapac software for process optimization. Discover more news. If you want to check out all the Dynapac news items click here. To unlock extra Dynapac news items you have to log in with your MyDynapac account first.
- Dynapack engineers refuse to let conventional thinking dictate our product design. We work hard to make sure that our chassis dyno is the best in the world - and it keeps getting better. “State of the art” is an over-used term, but if you are looking for a dyno that really is on the leading edge of technology, it has to be a Dynapack.
- Dynapack Viewer Software Windows 7; Dynapack Viewer Software Download; Once i get my turbo, i plan on tuning on the dynapack and then heading over to the dynojet to get hp differencespeace outHARDCORE Mikey. Dynapaks will always dyno higher because there is no rotating mass resistance to go against it.I prefer Dynojet because like eddie123 said.
- The last i checked, dynapack had a software upgrade and the new software and 4 wheel drive controller is different to the older ones. New software and 4-wheel frive controller can do SMG cars and had a few 'bugs' removed from the old system. Hmm, wonder whether i should use the older set-up. Any comments will be appreciated.
Once i get my turbo, i plan on tuning on the dynapack and then heading over to the dynojet to get hp differencespeace outHARDCORE Mikey. Dynapaks will always dyno higher because there is no rotating mass resistance to go against it.I prefer Dynojet because like eddie123 said, it all about how much you actually putting down on the ground that counts in the real world, not with car up on a lift or jackstands or whatever.Plus, it is easier to guage ur ETs with dynojet numbers.Which is precisely why a Dynapack is better. Using a.normal. dyno gives less accurate results because of tire slip and deformation. The rotating mass resistance statement is just plain wrong. Of course there's resistance, that's how they measure the power output.Remember a dyno is only as good as it's operator and when it was last calibrated. The number produced is valid only as a comparative tool for comparing one run to the next on the same dyno.
If you don't like your numbers find another dyno, there are plenty around that will give you what you want. SCC has a chassis dyno test comparison in Aug issue.
They test 7 different dynos.Their conclusion: Its impossible to say.They seem to think the pak was better at repeatability. But the jets seemed better to compare between different dynos.I've been using a jet and it is very consistant pull to pull and different days. So I would have no problem using it for precise tuning.Plus I only want to know what I'm putting down to tarmac. If its off because of tire pressure, then its off because of tire pressure.umm who cares?The way I do my testing is run a current state dyno and then immediately run the test dyno after installing the new mod. So little things like tire pressure don't matter. SCC has a chassis dyno test comparison in Aug issue. They test 7 different dynos.Their conclusion: Its impossible to say.They seem to think the pak was better at repeatability.
But the jets seemed better to compare between different dynos.I've been using a jet and it is very consistant pull to pull and different days. So I would have no problem using it for precise tuning.Plus I only want to know what I'm putting down to tarmac. If its off because of tire pressure, then its off because of tire pressure.umm who cares?The way I do my testing is run a current state dyno and then immediately run the test dyno after installing the new mod. So little things like tire pressure don't matter.So the V2 robbed you of.2whp and gave you.8wtq compared to stock air box? IMG+V2+Borla only yield 6.4whp and 2.9tq? Gain of that IMG is most impressive over the V2 and Borla though.
SCC has a chassis dyno test comparison in Aug issue. They test 7 different dynos.Their conclusion: Its impossible to say.They seem to think the pak was better at repeatability. But the jets seemed better to compare between different dynos.I've been using a jet and it is very consistant pull to pull and different days.
So I would have no problem using it for precise tuning.Plus I only want to know what I'm putting down to tarmac. If its off because of tire pressure, then its off because of tire pressure.umm who cares?The way I do my testing is run a current state dyno and then immediately run the test dyno after installing the new mod. So little things like tire pressure don't matter.It's not tire pressure it's tire slip and deformation which will vary from run to run - although as the tires heat up the pressure will change introducing more error.As far as comparing the same type of dyno in different locations - this comes down to the calibration of the dyno and the operator. Again the Dynapack should produce more consistent results because you've taken the tires out of the equation.I don't understand your pre-occupation with wanting a whp number, it's just a number and given the known inaccuracies with wheel dynos it's not as accurate a number as you'll get from a Dynapack. A Dynapack does what wheel dynos can only dream of.
The drivetrain of a car all the way to the wheels is composed of metal interacting with metal so there's not a lot of give and take. The big problem is when to get to the squeegy, soft deformable lumps at the end of the drivetrain - the tires. If your mod delivers a big enough gain you will see it on a wheel dyno, but if you're only talking a few hp it can be lost in the grey area called your tires.Bottom line is a dyno does not provide real world picture of what your engine is putting on the road - how can it, a dyno is not a road. The only way to accurately measure hp is by using an engine dyno. Almost everyone knows that comparing dyno numbers makes absolutely no sense, yet you couldn't tell that by all the dyno hp numbers displayed in signatures. The only thing dynos are good for is tuning cars. You change variables and see how the car responds.
Dynapack Viewer Software Windows 7
Dynapack Viewer Software App
Other than that, the same dyno might show different numbers next time you get on it.That said, I do think some dynos have more merit than others. For example, I am not clear why the DynoJet dominates the market in the US when it really can't be used for anything other than WOT performance. I am also not sure why DynoDynamics operators rarely talk about the correction factor they all use to make their numbers look more like DynoJet numbers.
And I have to agree with those who report DynaPack numbers that can be lower or higher than DynoJet numbers. I've personally been on a DynaPack that read quite low and on one that read much higher.I do like the DynaPack for its versatility and the fact that it takes the wheel variable out of the game.
Dynapack Viewer Software Download
I don't like the setup procedure, the marginal software, and the vibrations during a DynaPack run.I think the Mustang is underrated. I really like that setup, and it's great for part throttle tuning. The software, too, could be better (that really goes for all of them), but I wish there were more Mustangs out there.Another thing that puzzles me: during the EFI101 University course I attended last week, the very experienced instructor said that tailpipe sniffers are all but useless for monitoring AF in a cat car, and that only sensors before the cat will yield accurate results. If so, then all of my dyno runs to-date must have yielded inaccurate AF results. Mods: Stage 3 Comptech SC, AEM CAI, Comptech street header, stock cat, modified stock injectors, Hondata K-Pro, Hondata IMG, Fujitsubo PG catback, cat, 225/45-17 Goodrich G-force Rivals on Kazera rims, Mugen SS, Quaife LSD, CT lightweight flywheel and street clutch, ACT heavy-duty pressure plate, CT rear sway/tie bar and titanium front strut brace, Type-R replica wing, CT short shifter, Auto Meter Sport Comp full-sweep boost gauge.
Current results: 290 whp on DynaPack. Another thing that puzzles me: during the EFI101 University course I attended last week, the very experienced instructor said that tailpipe sniffers are all but useless for monitoring AF in a cat car, and that only sensors before the cat will yield accurate results. If so, then all of my dyno runs to-date must have yielded inaccurate AF results.you make several good points. Regarding the positioning of the wideband O2 sensor, it is true that sensors placed at the muffler are not as accurate as ones placed before the cat/at the test pipe.
Coca-Cola Amatil Indonesia Awarded PT Dynaplast as The Best Supply Continuity 2018
Monday April 9th, 2018
Again, PT Dynaplast proudly received The Award from Coca-Cola Amatil Indonesia as The Best Supply Continuity in “Partner For Growth” Event that held on Monday, 9 April 2018, at Hotel Mulia Jakarta. This event was attended by all Board of Directors of Coca-Cola Amatil Indonesia, suppliers, business partners and other guests. Partner For Growth is […] PT Dynaplast Received Two Awards from Coca-Cola Amatil in 2017
Wednesday March 29th, 2017
(Left to right ): Mr. Hasan Hambali – GMD Industrial Packaging Dynapack Asia Mr. Bennett Jap – New Business Development Business Unit Head Dynapack Asia Mr. Robin – Regional Sales Account Manager PT Dynaplast Mr. Gigy Phillips – Director of Supply Chain Coca-Cola Amatil Indonesia Mr. Tony Hambali – CEO of Dynapack Asia This […] Management & Executives of Dynapack Asia Volunteering to Build a School in Mauk – Banten
Wednesday December 7th, 2016
Dynapack Asia collaborate with Habitat for Humanity Indonesia, a global non-profit organization, to build a School for Early Childhood Education in Kedung Dalem, Mauk – Banten. This project is a corporate social responsibility of Dynapack Asia, which Dynapack Group principled to always provide something useful for the community, especially through education. “Social responsibility has always […] Dynapack Indonesia Signed MoU with Prasetiya Mulya University
Wednesday November 30th, 2016
Dynapack Indonesia officially formed a collaboration with Prasetiya Mulya University that marked by the signing of a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) on November 30, 2016. Prasetiya Mulya University is one of the best business school in Indonesia with it’s commitment to create business practitioners and professional who can meet the qualifications and needs of various […] “Keep Learning until You’re Old,” a Message from Mr. Soebekti Hambali
Thursday June 23rd, 2016
Mr. Soebekti Hambali, the founder of Dynaplast celebrated his 91st birthday on June 23rd, 2016. A special celebration was held at Dynaplast Jatake, the oldest plant where Om, a nickname given for Mr. Soebekti Hambali, first started Dynaplast. The members of Dynapack Asia’s board of commisioners, directors, and employees, as well as the families all […] Dynaplast Cikarang 4 won the Gold Award: The Best Label Design in 2016 IMDA Awards
Monday June 6th, 2016
![App App](/uploads/1/1/8/6/118625939/764574150.jpg)
Indonesian Company, Dynaplast Added US$ 19 million Investment in Vietnam
Dynapack Viewer Software Download
Thursday March 27th, 2014
Dynaplast, an Indonesian company specialized in manufacture of rigid plastic packaging, added its investment in Vietnam amounted US$ 19 million in 2012, contributing to increase of Indonesian companies investment in Vietnam to US$ 233 million. The company in 2004 invested US$ 4 million to set up a factory in Binh Duong province, southern Vietnam. Appreciate […] Dynaplast Go Private
Tuesday October 22nd, 2013
Emiten PT Dyna pack berancang-ancang go private (delisting) di Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI). Perusahaan plastik itu menawarkan 33,25 persen saham perseroan dan publiknya, atau sebanyak 104.635.793 lembar saham dengan harga Rp 4.500 per saham. Kami target Juli nanti dieksekusi kata Presiden Direktur Dynaplast Tony Hambali, Senin (25/4).Merujuk pada prospektus perusahaan, secara terperinci harga penawaran itu […] FAR EAST: Singapore’s Dynapack Asia completes plastic form acquisition
Saturday October 19th, 2013
“We are excited to welcome Viscount Malaysia to the Dynapack business, Dynapack chief executive Tony Hambali said in a statement. “Viscount Malaysia has earned a reputation for delivering high quality packaging products to its customers. He added: “We are confident that Dynapack can further enhance this reputation by investing and upgrading the business to provide […] CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITIES
Dynapack Viewer Software Free
Friday October 11th, 2013